Time-Actor:
The Time-Actor is an invisible factor, working in sequential pauses, and events and results and causes bringing to pass a happening, an event of time, recurring and returning to its source.
Of course, what we all see is what happens to be at this moment of time, that we can appreciate with our minds unless, of course, we are blind to the resultant frequencies.
The casual nodes and the patterns of vibrational disturbance that express themselves as objects and things and even voices like this one, which, for instance, can bend time.
On the other hand, we can say, that time does not exist at all and it's just the way that we have to grasp things with our minds in order to be able to see anything or hear anything at all.
And that in the state of perfect freedom, time is neither a moment nor beyond nor forever—time is the nowness of the singleness of the oneness—the uniqueness of the inseparability of the cause and event syndrome that produces itself in the notion of time and sequence, cause and moment, result and pattern.
If you see what I mean.
And yet (time?), if there were no time, there could be no division, no extension, no life as we know it. No duration.
And so, if this is a division of something which does not exist, then how can we say that we, who experience time, and we who create time by being here at all can experience something which does not exist?
How can we say that we exist?
Well, as long as there is time for us to do so. We can be here, we can see here, we can stand here. We can even examine what we do when we are here. Although, in one manner of speaking as time doesn't exist but not theorical.
Particle: With me on the programme today, (um) we'd like to congratulate this particular human for coming somewhat near to realising that (uhh) we particles on ...
Time-Actor: ... sequence and duration and strength and power.
Something which we cannot describe, but which everything that exists describes.
Particle: Right.
Time-Actor: Then this is what time is describing and therefore time may be said to be description of what ultimately is.
Particle: Not bad.
Time-Actor: And so we, the time-actors, the invisible factors fashion a coat for time to wear, so that it can see itself and enjoy its own beauty.
Particle: Ah.
Particle: There's just one little flaw here, because you presume time to be separate from what ultimately is, and yet any description of what is must be a description ...
Time-Actor: No!
Particle: By itself of itself. This is very difficult ...
Time-Actor: No!
Particle: ... for any human mind to appreciate, particles, and I'm sure you'd like to give him a round of ...
Time-Actor: No!
Particle: ... applause, that he has actually come somewhat near towards assimilating a real identity.
Time-Actor: No!
Particle: A humble view of their own part in the creation of the universe around us, in us, beyond us.
Time-Actor: Of course, the wonderful thing of it all is, that no one has time to experience all of time.
And even if we added together all the people who ever have experienced time, and will experience it.
Particle: Eh.
Particle: What?
Time-Actor: They still wouldn't describe it.
Particle: Why not?
Time-Actor: And couldn't describe it.
Particle: Why not?
Time-Actor: What is a long time to one person is a short time to another, and is exactly the same time to a clock.
Particle: Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha!
Time-Actor: And if we tried to get all the people to speak at the same time about them all the time,
there'd be ...
Particle: All the time.
Time-Actor: ... terrible jabbering of voices.
Particle: (...)
Time-Actor: So if we really wanted all the people everywhere, that ever experienced time, to talk about time
at the same time, they would all have to say one single thing together.
Particle: Time!
Time-Actor: Perhaps that would be the word of "Time", but ...
Particle: Time!
Time-Actor: ... then it ceases to have any meaning.
Particle: TIME!